指定山东泰山队参加亚冠，上海上港球迷的建议，无视规则的呓语（点名山东泰山出战亚冠？上港球迷此建议罔顾规则）

Considering user intent in response

The user has provided a Chinese sentence that translates to a claim about Shandong Taishan's participation in the AFC Champions League and that it contradicts the rules. They may want to write a statement or article expressing that this suggestion from Shanghai Port fans is nonsensical. Given the ambiguity, I think it’s essential to ask some clarifying questions. However, I might also proactively draft a commentary, discussing the rules surrounding the AFC Champions League and relevant qualifications.Clarifying sports commentary

The phrase used in the user’s message is strong, but I think it's more about sports banter rather than hate speech. I don’t need to overcomplicate the response; I can generate text directly. I want to be concise and provide bullet points with reasoning and possibly a sample post. I can outline the qualification rules since the AFC Champions League structure is changing for the 2024-25 season. The focus should be on league standings and FA Cup winners, while also being cautious about specifics to prevent inaccuracies.Drafting commentary on AFC rules

I want to lay out some key rule categories like sporting merit principles and licensing reviews. If a club withdraws or isn’t eligible, the spot should go to the next eligible club based on competition ranking, not just a fan's choice. I need to highlight that slots aren't transferable, meaning only the association can nominatе following the rules. I’ll provide a sample Weibo post with a proper structure and make sure it’s concise, offering both a short and long version for the user to choose from. Also, I’ll ask if they prefer a specific style for their platform!